data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c1d/e0c1d6b986f489b40e62e726fe263ea9b2bafeae" alt=""
So I thought, when I turned 30 (which was in 1996), that kids would be digging on 70s-era Elton John, Bee Gees, Boston and Joni Mitchell, right alongside The Fugees, Garbage, Flaming Lips and Alanis Morrisette. I was fully expecting Dustin Hoffman, Al Pacino and Gene Hackman to remain box-office draws alongside Will Smith, Tom Cruise and Eddie Murphy. And I thought 15-year-olds then would be tuning into All In The Family, The Bob Newhart Show, and M.A.S.H. when they got home from school.
But it didn't go down like that. I hadn't counted on time speeding up, and new things taking over again and again, with the 24-hour-cable-channel obsession for novelty shoving the merely mature into the impossibly ancient. When I realized this was the newborn way of things, it broke my heart. When I mentioned Devo one time, some kid went "Who?" (a snobbishly faux-inquisitive response that's still used to make us "oldsters"--yeah, we're so fucking decrepit at 30--feel like outmoded dopes). I felt older at 30 than the 30-year-olds that I knew when I was 10 surely felt. And I felt cheated and angry, because I was no longer allowed to talk to most younger people--who are always, no matter the era, yes, understandably struggling to forge their own identities--without feeling like I should be walking with a goddamn cane. Thank heavens I at least was there at the Internet's outset.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90977/90977cc5903c9209d548c575feddebb70b7ee101" alt=""
I have absolutely never felt like a movie had opened up my brainbox, peered in, glopped its mits into the remains, and slathered it onscreen as I have with Noah Baumbauch's Greenberg. It's MY movie. I feel protective of it, like I did with SCTV way back in 1977 when no one else I knew got or watched it. I think it's a movie that heartbeats on where the forgotten tadpoles are coming from--you know, that tiny clan called X, smooshed in between the overwhelming Boomers and Ys. Baumbach is my age, so, given his newest movie (after The Squid and the Whale's excellence and the muddy Margot at the Wedding), I'm now even more convinced he knows abandonment intimately, and is bound to paint its details.
Now, here it is, eight months after Greenberg's quiet theatrical release, and I'm even more convinced that no one gives a good goddamn about us Xers, seeing that no one's giving the film it due. Yep. We've been thrown on the scrap heap. We don't count, because we're part of neither movement that buffets us fore and aft. And, since we grew up with Watergate, Mad Magazine, and Wacky Packages, we can't be sold to, so we can just all go and get fucked. I never thought I was going to see a movie like Greenberg. When it arrived, and was over, I was ecstatic. But everyone else--that is, the paying public--seems to see it as a complete bore, a mystery. Greenberg stands as a self-fulfilling prophecy printed in gleaming Cinemascope.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2aef/e2aef4670c433b42c0036b323b9772d996fe3da8" alt=""
Baumbach's film, like many great movies, begins quite unlike you might think, though. Its first minutes center in on Greta Gerwig's Florence, a 26-year-old woman making a living tending to Roger's spoiled, awful, wealthy brother (Chris Messina). You can immediately tell the guy's an ass because of the subtly pissy way he tosses a plastic bag after Florence tells him she couldn't find those chocolate-covered rice balls he likes, even after going to two places. This is only one of her frantic duties for the family before they take off on a too-hep vacation in Vietnam. He tells Florence, as she deals so sweetly with his two kids and his obviously condescending wife, that his brother Roger will be taking care of the house and their German Shepard, Mahler, while they're gone. She takes this on as another task (even though she hasn't been paid in three weeks and later has to borrow money from her best friend; and then Mama Greenberg has the gall to gently scold her for not reminding them to pay up).
Florence, in her warm ragged clothes, is a lovely person. She adores her job, and the people she works for, and clearly likes the kids so much that she's willing to overlook all of her employers' terrible attributes (you can tell she's been unfairly chewed out by them before). Her opening exchange with the kids, who obviously dig her, makes it clear that she's good at her job now, and that she succeeds in anticipating whatever peccidillos the Greenbergs might spring on her. But somehow Florence can't find anybody who loves her.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3a04/c3a0422668859298b7a47367322b6917e535db14" alt=""
We see Greenberg from behind at first, as he calls Florence, alarmed that next-door neighbors are using his brother's pool. The first time we see his face he (also significantly) tells Florence, who's wants to come by, "Yeah, I'll be here." And then, Roger and Florence have their first moments together, with Florence showing yet more of her nurturing side by fawning over Mahler (laughing, as she gives him a treat, "His tongue's so scratchy"). This is not meet cute, though. It's beautifully meet semi-ugh. (I love this one pregnant pause in the conversation, followed by Florence concluding with "Cool.") Still, though, you can feel that both are needy, nerdy and funny, and so they're intrigued with each other not without cause.
Roger very much seems uncaring later on in the film. In fact, he can be a downright a-hole. But, in these first scenes, we see he's not such a bad guy. He dutifully takes care of Mahler; he notices a door is sticking so he whittles it down, and he begins building the dog a master bedroom. He bravely tries out the pool, even though he doesn't know how to swim. And he notices there's a problem when Mahler is unresponsive to a frisbee throw. This worries him, and he calls Florence in to help. He doesn't even mind when his brother, from continents away, slaps him with the sort of abuse Roger is probably used to (and has often probably deserved).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/782c0/782c09f88a3d4bf88a2595b95f3591885bc63828" alt=""
Meanwhile, Florence seems lost without her daily duties. She has a vague desire to sing, and does so with pluck to a nearly empty house. And she has a secret. And she seems open to starting up a strange dalliance with Greenberg that's studded with Roger's nervous outbursts and discomfort with humanity (this results in a couple of sex scenes that're absolutely without comparison; they're interrupted and ghastly). But she finds him surprising, and vulnerable, and that keeps her going. For many viewers, this seems unlikely, even unimaginable. But Gerwig makes this work, because we can tell her Florence is affectionate for those things that need affection (at the vet, she pets Mahler with her red-socked foot). I have to confess: I'm in love with Gerwig as a result of this role. I think I fell for her at first sight, as Steve Miller's "Jet Airliner" plays over the credits, and as she smiles slightly as we admire at her exquisite profile. But I think what really did it for me was seeing her alone at home, drunk after a Greenberg snub, dancing goofily to and singing along with Paul McCartney's "Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey." I wanted to hug her--or Florence--forever and ever. Make no mistake: this IS the best performance of the year. Gerwig is outstanding in every way, in every frame. She is a star, for sure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23a44/23a44e7146337dbc93ea252aa27b94b74ef7570a" alt=""
The thing about you kids is that you're all kind of insensitive. I'm glad I grew up when I did cause your parents were too perfect at parenting--all that baby Mozart and those Dan Zanes songs; you're just so sincere and interested in things. There's a confidence in you guys that's horrifying. You're all ADD and carpal tunnel. You wouldn't know agoraphobia if it bit you in the ass, and it makes you mean. You say things to someone like me who's older and smarter with this light air. I'm freaked out by you kids. I hope I die before I end up meeting one of you in a job interview.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6641/e664181be32acd1f4f5c5ef558831dde01baff3e" alt=""
I guess a lot of viewers out there don't like Roger Greenberg because they don't want to know him. Or maybe it's because they don't want to BE him, and often, in movies, we only wanna see people up on screen that we wanna be. But then how would one explain all these anti-heroes out there that people of all post-60s generations love--Travis Bickle, or Tony Soprano, or Michael Corleone? Of course, these are violent people--people who command power through a trigger squeeze. Greenberg has no power at all. In fact, I don't think Greenberg's ever been in the same building with a gun. The guy doesn't even drive, though he's an expert at telling other people how to do so (as a non-driver myself, I see this as a positive trait).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53db5/53db5be154fcb8d8920d223d8e0211fb014b9d5a" alt=""
But not so fast. Roger and Florence, they're still in the ring, even though their punches hardly ever land. That's exactly what I love about Baumbach's movie--it follows Roger and Florence as if it were the SALT II talks between generations, and it's passionate about these flawed schnooks. This is the writer/director's most accomplished, insightful, empathetic script. It's a movie with hope, but not too much of it (it never becomes a picture Greenberg would write a snide Letter to the Editor against--by the way, Greenberg's letters are the only element of the film I don't buy). This is also Baumbach's most visually on-target film (thanks to the sharp widescreen photography by the always reliable Harris Savides, and also to the accurate, never overdone production design by Ford Wheeler). I could go on and on, scene by scene, and tell you exactly why I love about nearly everything about it--Lindsay Lohan, Creamsicles, Sealey matresses, Arnold Palmers, Gung Ho, the Flash, a shared Corona, and James Murphy's gentle score--but I think you get the idea. Greenberg is my favorite movie of 2010, and I don't think anything else is gonna come anywhere near its richness.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e822f/e822ff8fc7c536c0804f8ad490d6ce8b55263068" alt=""
4 comments:
Would you argue that he doesn't find the need to have a gun and kill anyone because he's already 'killed'/destroyed the lives of the ones closest to him when he resisted the contract?
Well, he's certainly killed his fair share of relationships, you're right. In that way, he's an expert marksman.
Excellent review. Greenberg also struck a tone with me, another 40-something who is rebelling against the need to always be doing something.
I agree with you about the letter writing being the one part of Greenberg's persona that was ill fitting. I see the need for the filmmakers to use it as a substitute voice-over exposition for Greenberg's quirks, but I would have rather seen those moments filled with Greenberg silently doing nothing, letting Ben's intensity do the speaking.
Still, I liked those moments, because they signified Greenberg's choice to stay in contact with the outside world. I only wish they had been treated only slightly differently.
Post a Comment